Your **FI number**—or financial independence number—details how much money you need to successfully retire. Or under the right circumstances, how much money you need to retire *ea**rly*.

**Table of Contents**show

Calculating your FI number involves a combination of personal circumstances and societal circumstances. We’ll cover some important questions that you ought to ask yourself.

Let’s walk through the three easy steps for you to calculate your own FI number.

## Step 1: How Much Will You Spend in Retirement?

The most important question in calculating your FI number is **ho****w much money will you spend in retirement?**

At first, that question seems daunting. *Ho**w can I be expected to calculate 30, 40, 50 years of expenses?*

Good news, reader. All you have to do is calculate **on****e year of expenses**. Later in the article, we apply some general rules to turn one year of expenses into a full retirement’s FI number.

### How Much Will You Spend in a Year?

Most popular financial websites—Fidelity, NerdWallet, MarketWatch, etc.—suggest that typical retirees spend ~80% of their final year’s income as annual retirement spending. This is **du****mb**.

Why scale final year *in**come* to retirement *spending*? If a worker earns $100,000 in his last working year—but we don’t know *an**ything* else about his lifestyle—how can we confidently suggest that he will spend $80,000 per year in retirement?

Since we want to know about retirement *spending*, why not look at working years’ *spending*? Compare spending to spending. Doesn’t that make more sense?!

That’s what **SmartAsset** did when they found that “average retired household spends $45,756 each year…[which is] $15,200, or 25%, less than the average working household.”

Boom! There’s a good **rule of thumb**. You can estimate that you’ll spend 75% of your current annual spending during retirement.

Don’t know your current spending? All the more reason to start a **budget**.

#### Don’t Forget Inflation

Let’s say Ben spent $40,000 in 2020. Using our rule of thumb, Ben estimates he’ll spend $30,000 per year in retirement. $30K is 75% of $40K. Easy peasy.

**Wait!!****!**

Ben has neglected inflation, the idea that services and goods tend to get more expensive over time.

If Ben is retiring in 2021, then his $30,000 estimate is probably ok. But if he’s planning a retirement starting in 2030, he needs to account for 10 years of inflation.

Historical inflation rates in the U.S. have typically fallen in the range of 2 to 5% per year. There is some present concern that the COVID-19 stimulus packages might push inflation higher soon.

If Ben is conservative, perhaps he’ll predict a 4% per year inflation rate for these next 10 years.

$30,000 * 1.04^10 = $30,000 * 1.48 = **$44,400 per year**

That’s significantly different than Ben’s original $30,000 assumption. Inflation is important to consider.

Do you have your annual retirement spending number?!

## Step 2: Pick Your Withdrawal Rate

Your **wi****thdrawal rate** is the percentage of your retirement portfolio that you will convert to cash each year to live off of.

Our goal in retirement to pick a **sa****fe** withdrawal rate, or SWR. Safe, in this context, refers to a withdrawal rate that ensures we never run out of money. Running out of money in retirement is bad…agreed?

To understand how an SWR relates to the FI number, we need to understand retirement planning economics.

### How SWR Relates to the FI Number

We expect our retirement portfolio to change during retirement. Duh! We’re withdrawing money each year, so we expect our portfolio to decrease.

At first blush, most people assume a retirement portfolio will change like this:

Year 2 Portfolio = Year 1 Portfolio – Money I Withdraw

Simple subtraction. Each year you subtract more money from your portfolio until you run out. Makes sense…

**Nope**! That’s too simple. And thankfully, this is an error in our favor. In reality, the retirement portfolio math looks like this:

Year 2 Portfolio = Year 1 Portfolio – Money I Withdraw +

Investment Growth

What a big difference! Sure, we subtract money every year via withdrawals. But we add value every year (or at least, most years) through investment gains.

It doesn’t take a math genius to realize, “If my **Investment Growth** is *equal *to the **Money I Withdraw**, then those two terms of the equation ‘cancel out.’ My portfolio will never change…I’ll never run out of money!”

Therefore, a simple SWR would be equal and opposite to a conservative investment growth rate. If I expect that my Investment Growth is 3% per year, then that growth will counteract an SWR of 3%. I could choose a 3% SWR and never run out of money. Boom!

### What is a Reasonable Investment Growth Rate?

We need to know: **how quickly do investments grow**? In the previous paragraph, we assumed a growth rate of 3% per year. Is that realistic?

If we expect growth of 10% per year, we can retire much sooner than if we expect 2% per year. This question has (literally) trillions of dollars depending on it.

Like many personal finance topics, there’s no one-size-fits-all answer. Different assets grow at different rates (stocks vs. real estate vs. gold, etc) and different people have different risk appetites (optimistic vs. pessimistic).

But there is a terrific rule of thumb known as the **4%**** Rule. **For background on the 4% Rule, read this **Best Interest** article about **the Trinity Study.**

The summary of the 4% Rule is that a typical retiree can use **4%** as their SWR for a 30-year retirement. In practice, the retiree would withdraw 4% of their portfolio in Year 1 of retirement. They would then increase that withdrawal amount by the inflation rate for Year 2 of retirement. Each subsequent year would be scaled by inflation.

Does the 4% Rule mean investments grow at 4% per year? Not necessarily.

Some years will see large growth, greater than 4%. Other years might see small growth or negative growth. Worse yet, there could be series of years of suboptimal growth. But over long timespans (e.g., 30 years), a 4% withdrawal rate is safe.

4% is an SWR that the Trinity Study found safe for most conservative retirement portfolios.

### What SWR Should *You* Use for Your FI Number?

So…is it 4%?

Maybe. The true answer is that SWR is complicated. One of the more famous projects in the financial independence world is **Big ERN’s Safe Withdrawal Series**. Big ERN has a Ph.D. in Economics and has written **more than 40 articles** detailing various aspects of finding your SWR.

But for the sake of brevity, there are a few shortcuts to give you an SWR starting point.

- Start at 4%. It’s a reasonable starting point.
- If you plan on being retired for more than 30 years,
**decrease**your SWR by ~0.25% for every 10 years of additional retirement. - If you expect social security to play a large role in your retirement income, then
**increase**your SWR by ~0.5%. The origins of the 4% Rule didn’t assume Social Security would be around to help. - If you want to be conservative,
**decrease**your SWR by ~0.5%

You’ll probably end up with an SWR between 3.0% and 4.5%.

So…how do we now find our FI number?

## Step 3: Find Your FI Number

If you know your **annual retirement spending** and your **safe withdrawal rate**, then calculating your FI number takes one simple arithmetic step.

**Your FI Number = Your Annual Retirement Spending / Safe Withdrawal Rate**

That’s it! Let’s go back to Ben and calculate his FI number.

We determined earlier that Ben’s annual retirement spending (starting in 2030) will be $44,000 per year. And for now, let’s use the traditional safe withdrawal rate of 4%.

Ben’s FI number is $44,000 / 4% = $1,100,000. That’s **$1.1 million**.

Some of you might notice that dividing by 4% is equivalent to multiplying by 25 [1 divided by 4% equals 25]. This leads to another common rule of thumb: your retirement nest egg should 25 times your annual spending.

If Ben used a more conservative SWR—say, 3%—then his FI number goes up to **$1.47 million**. This makes sense. Since Ben chose to be *conservative *in his retirement calculations, he should save *more* to hit his FI number

## How Could The FI Number Go Wrong?

Your FI number provides a starting point for retirement. But the world is a dynamic place, and your retirement plan might require adjustments as you age.

### Sequence of Returns Risk

For example, one large retirement risk is the “sequence of returns” risk. This risk is that your investments might perform poorly in the early years of your retirement, thus draining your portfolio faster and earlier than anticipated. Your FI number ends up being too small compared to reality.

Thankfully, there are many ways to combat this risk.

For starters, the 4% Rule already has a safety net built-in. It has been successfully back-tested against historical market performance. This includes analyses of negative returns during early retirement.

In fact, the 4% Rule was designed with extreme conservatism. I’ve written about this idea in an article about **ergodicity**. It’s meant to be successful in 95-100% of all retirement scenarios.

Financial adviser Michael Kitces points out that the 4% Rule would leave a retiree with **more money at death than when they started retirement **for most of the historical back-testing periods. That’s not a typo. It’s conservatism.

#### Solutions to Sequence of Returns Risk

Only the worst-of-the-worst luck leads to the 4% Rule failing. And if you have bad returns early in retirement, then there are two “easy” stop-gaps:

- Find an enjoyable income stream. If you can support your lifestyle for a couple years with labor (rather than by withdrawing your investment dollars), you’ll give your investments more time to (hopefully) bounce back.
- Decrease your spending. I know retirement is about recreation and relaxation, but consider putting off any major expenditures until after the investment markets have recovered.

This plot shows a simple example of sequence of returns risk.

- The orange dotted line shows a hypothetical investment performance. Notice how it does poorly early in retirement.
- The yellow hashed line shows a steadily rising cost of living over retirement.
- And the blue line shows a ratio of the two lines—
*how many shares of my orange index fund do I need to sell to fund my yellow cost-of-living?*

Since this particular retirement is struck by poor early investment performance, we’re required to withdraw more of our investments to fund our lifestyle (unless we find another income stream or decrease our expenses). That’s what the **blu****e line** shows via the early peaks.

If we think of **sh****ares** as the ultimate resource (rather than dollars), we might hesitate to sell 60 shares in one year early in retirement when those same 60 shares fund **three ****years** of retirement later on (see the right Y-axis).

### You Live Longer Than Expected

Another “risk” to the FI number is that you live longer than expected. Is this a problem?! Sounds like a good thing to me 🙂

It’s true: if we plan for a 30-year retirement and live for 40 years, we might see a problem. We could run out of money! But thankfully, the solution is similar to a sequence of returns solution.

We can dynamically change our retirement plan *aft**er* we’re already retired to account for any new gaps in our FI number. For example, we can sit down once a year and ask, “*Wh**at if* I live to 95 instead of 85?”

As noted above, most conservative retirement plans end up with **mo****re** money after 30 years than where they started. For these people, living longer than expected will not negatively affect their retirement or their FI number.

### Retiring the FI Number

There’s your primer on the FI number. It’s how much money you need to successfully retire. And to calculate it, take your annual retirement spending and divide it by your safe withdrawal rate. That’s it!

Thank you for reading! If you enjoyed this article and want to read more, check out my **Archive** or **Subscribe **to get future articles emailed to your inbox.

-Jesse

P.S. – If you enjoy podcasts, check out **the Best Interest Podcast**!

P.P.S – **I wrote a book!** Check out the **ebook here **and the **physical Amazon book here**.

Good summary of some of the numbers everyone talks about in FIRE.

I personally use the 4% rule (25 X your expenses) for my FI number. I track my expenses so that was easy for me to do.

The question “How much money you need to retire early?” is a loaded question and depends on a bunch of factors and assumptions which you cover really well above.

I think the best answer is to use the 4% as a target and then be flexible and adaptable.

Hi Tech. Yeah, this is definitely a “straightforward” article. I’m trying to build out some of my ‘building blocks’ articles to counteract all the in-depth, more complex stuff 🙂

I’m with you…4% is the place to start, then adjust as needed. Thanks for reading and commenting!

-Jesse